Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Lumley Castle Hotel
Sponsored by
Chester-le-Street, www.lumleycastle.com
 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Legal bid to halt ghost ships work



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

ENVIRONMENTAL protesters have vowed to take legal action after Able UK won an appeal which will allow it to scrap the controversial ghost ship fleet.
Representatives from Friends of Hartlepool and Hartlepool and North Tees Friends of the Earth have been battling with the compnay for more than five years and now plan to appeal against the latest decision.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Click this link to email the newsdesk with your views

It follows a ruling by Hazel Blears, secretary of state for communities and local government, to give the company permission for its controversial plans.

It comes after a two-week public inquiry in which Able UK appealed against Hartlepool Borough Council's original decision to reject their plans to dismantle the former US navy vessels.

The ships are currently docked at Able UK's Graythorp yard, near Seaton Carew.

Protesters will now apply to the High Court, in London, for a judicial review of the inquiry decision.

Jean Kennedy, founder member of Friends of Hartlepool, said: "Our main concern is for the health and safety of the children and the future issues of this town. How can we go forward if everybody keeps pushing us back.

"As far as we are concerned the fight is on. We are going to judicial review; there is no doubt about it. We have six weeks to appeal against the decision and we will be doing so straight away."

The secretary of state's decision means that Able UK has two sets of applications after the council's planning committee controversially reversed their decision in October last year.

Iris Ryder, founder member of Friends of Hartlepool, said: "Able UK should never have been allowed to bring that second application while the public inquiry was ongoing.

"If they insisted on bringing the application then they should at least abide by the rules that were laid down and that includes 24-hour monitoring of the site."

Able UK now has permission to extend the use of the TERRC site to include construction, repair, refurbishment and decommissioning of all types of ships.

Permission has also been granted to refurbish the quays, construct a cofferdam, and build new dock gates.

Last month a 28-day public consultation was launched after Able UK applied to the Environment Agency for a waste management licence.

The firm needs the licence in order to carry out the dismantling work and the consultation comes to a close on Sunday, May 11.

Protesters have confirmed that they have lodged their objections with the Environment Agency.

Evelyn Leck, of Hartlepool and North Tees Friends of the Earth, said: "Able UK shouldn't be allowed to pick and choose which application to use because it is the next generation who will be picking up the tab.

"The fight goes on and we have managed to collect more than 3,000 signatures from people in town opposing the waste management licence."

Able UK has always maintained that work would be safely carried out and that the project would have huge economic benefits for the town. A spokesman said: "We will not be able to comment further at this time."


The full article contains 527 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 May 2008 2:55 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hartlepool
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.