Michael Phillips murder trial: Judge begins to sum up evidence in trial of seven Hartlepool men

The judge has begun to sum up evidence in the trial of seven Hartlepool men accused of murder as they sought justice over the theft of a car.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The defendants are Lee Darby, 32, of Ridley Court; Neil Elliott, 44, of Briarfields Close; Gary Jackson, 31, of The Darlings in Hart Village; John Musgrave, 54, of Wordsworth Avenue; Sean Musgrave, 30, also of Wordsworth Avenue; Anthony Small, 40, of Rydal Street, and Craig Thorpe, 36, of Young Street.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Darby and Elliott also deny burglary and Elliott denies assault.

Seven men deny the murder of Michael Phillips in a house in Rydal Street, Hartlepool, last June and are on trial at Teesside Crown Court.Seven men deny the murder of Michael Phillips in a house in Rydal Street, Hartlepool, last June and are on trial at Teesside Crown Court.
Seven men deny the murder of Michael Phillips in a house in Rydal Street, Hartlepool, last June and are on trial at Teesside Crown Court.

The court has heard the case centres on the search for those responsible for stealing Elliott's daughter’s car.

The Honourable Justice Judge Jacobs began to sum up the evidence, detailing the statements of witnesses who saw what happened on that day and telematic data about phones and Facebook messages, which helped map out the defendants’ movements.

He also recalled the medical evidence, including the cause of death, which two doctors concluded was down to multiple torso injuries, with head injuries a contributing factor.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It was detailed to the court that the suggestion 39-year-old Mr Phillips had died due to the amount of heroin he had taken before the attack was ruled out, as was any notion he had taken any in the wake of the assault.

His summing up will continue into tomorrow afternoon, with the case adjourned until 10.30am in the morning.

Earlier, Mark Trafford, defending Thorpe, was the final defence barrister to address the trial in summing up.

He said: “He happened to be in a street with two people who happen to be his friends.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“As a result of that, he faces the most serious charge in the criminal calendar.

“He did what I expect any of you would do if you had been at the scene of a crime, he went to a police station and said ‘I was there.’”